[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: next ballot

To: mpi-21@mpi-forum.org
Subject: Re: next ballot
From: Jesper Larsson Traeff <traff@ccrl-nece.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:22:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200110072007.PAA45502@mcs.anl.gov>; from Rusty Lusk on Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:07:15PM -0500
References: <200110072007.PAA45502@mcs.anl.gov>
Reply-To: mpi-21@mpi-forum.org
Sender: owner-mpi-21@mpi-forum.org


Has the voting started? If so (and even if not):

---

NEC agrees to all clarifications of Oct 7, 2001 (1-17), but with
the following suggestion/question:

Item 7:

Drop rationale (or at least the last sentence, "Extentding it...")

Drop the preceeding lines 6-10 on p. 120 (they are confusing, and seem
to say that with MPI_Accumulate the predefined op's can also be used with
certain user-defined datatypes. This is probably not intended!?)

---

Jesper & Hubert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: next ballot
  - From: William Gropp <gropp@mcs.anl.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: next ballot
Next by Date: Re: next ballot
Prev by thread: Re: next ballot
Next by thread: Re: next ballot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread