[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [mpi-21] ABI - call for working group




But surely the morph layer needs to be compiled against the local MPI? I
would much prefer a situation whereby my customers do not have to build
anything. By having a standard binary interface (which MPI
implementations are free to satisfy using the morph layer - and there
should still be an option to compile and link against the "native"
implementation to avoid any performance penalty in the morph layer),
there's nothing to compile.

I agree that it would be preferable. The question is: is it cost of standardizing it (effort + reduction in implementor flexibility) worth the benefit? In light of how much the morph layers can do, it seems to me that for most of the features in the ABI proposal the answer is no.


Greg Bronevetsky
Post-Doctoral Researcher
1028 Building 451
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
(925) 424-5756
bronevetsky1@xxxxxxxx