[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [mpi-21] ABI - call for working group




To respond briefly to some of the other points raised in this thread
from the perspective of The MathWorks - yes, something like a "morph"
layer would be acceptable - but to be effective for our customers, this
needs to be something that they have ready access to (i.e. they don't
need to build it, as I believe they would with the current MorphMPI
solution). Compatibility of mpirun/mpiexec would certainly be useful for
our customers, but that's easier to work around since no recompilation
is required.
Since you're distributing your software in binary form, you would compile the morph layer yourself and distribute your software already pre-linked with it. The morph layer would then adapt to your local MPI when you install your software. At install time it would need to have enough information about the local MPI to be able to link to it but shouldn't need much more than that.

Greg Bronevetsky
Post-Doctoral Researcher
1028 Building 451
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
(925) 424-5756
bronevetsky1@xxxxxxxx