[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [mpi-21] Call for MPI 2.2 and 3.0 agenda items for the Jan mee ting
- To: mpi-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [mpi-21] Call for MPI 2.2 and 3.0 agenda items for the Jan mee ting
- From: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:43:39 -0500
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=jsquyres@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
- Delivered-to: mpifrm-mpi-21-outgoing@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
- Delivered-to: mpifrm-mpi-21@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=856; t=1196603049; x=1197467049; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jsquyres@cisco.com; z=From:=20Jeff=20Squyres=20<jsquyres@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[mpi-21]=20Call=20for=20MPI=202.2=20and=203.0=20agend a=20items=20for=20the=20Jan=20mee=20ting |Sender:=20; bh=XB+sgZ89AqYnf2OVrsPAwwlrKjdXxWBf79jSkBudoZ0=; b=ILTyFwShTHxZGfHzea7fmnkLntamn5SZxLEoUbO9F6LNwJH+CEg3eng/QvJm7OnB9uIqjqtW f72tk44KEueAkWjgSDm2mMjxpVlykESySvZ82dSceqB3Rr1VVzFBYO5L;
- In-reply-to: <b2sJnFj5jj4d.jW4tgLTY@smtp.gmail.com>
- References: <b2sJnFj5jj4d.jW4tgLTY@smtp.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: mpi-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-mpi-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Dec 1, 2007, at 8:25 PM, William Yu wrote:
On the boost front, I liked how they implemented their MPI interface
that takes advantage of C++ language constructs over and above a
simple overlay or wrapper.
However, boost's implementation is boost specific right? I can't
compile the same code to another library because it is not
standardized. Fortunately, boost is open source.
Boost is a standalone system that (as I understand it) works on top of
most/any underlying MPI implementation/s. It is not a standard; I do
not believe that it was designed to be interoperable with anything.
Is something available for Java? I have yet to find one.
There were multiple Java research projects back in the 90's. mpiJava
was one, but I didn't really follow them closely.
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems