[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rules for voting
- To: mpi-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Rules for voting
- From: Jeff Squyres <jsquyres@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:16:40 -0500
- Authentication-results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=jsquyres@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
- Delivered-to: mpifrm-mpi-21-outgoing@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
- Delivered-to: mpifrm-mpi-21@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1152; t=1171113413; x=1171977413; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jsquyres@cisco.com; z=From:=20Jeff=20Squyres=20<jsquyres@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Rules=20for=20voting |Sender:=20 |To:=20mpi-21@mpi-forum.org; bh=6qb2Ta3xLJXVwpQEmBrGtul6KvcTWgVrcTU2RC1lxPo=; b=dhjOTDF5bCu8xwYqOQGwyyIujnJe+ka53Cwe3uHOayOzwZnmLeoNju6QYHBW6vM9Y8iGkUgA EK/cf7Ueyu1HfAjxA6foGwNJ4vJ8cxzbc4xwQmVrwYIqAVgpwfRnEO16;
- Reply-to: mpi-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-mpi-21@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill said:
The first order of business is to determine the rules for voting.
The rules that the MPI Forum has been using are posted on the MPI
2.1 web page (http://www.mpi-forum.org/mpi2_1/index.htm); the
history of errata votes (linked off of that page) shows which
institutions have participated in the last two ballots. I suggest
that we discuss updates to these rules to address the fact that we
probably won't have face-to-face meetings, at least in the
beginning. Then the current voting members (based on the last two
votes) can vote on that rule change.
Per the rule:
"To vote, an organization must have been present at the last two MPI
Forum meetings."
I guess the obvious question is: what metric should we use to
determine continued participation since there won't be physical
meetings?
I ask as someone who has changed organizations since the last time we
voted. Cisco has not participated in the last two "meetings", but I
would like to have the possibility of voting in the next ballots.
--
Jeff Squyres
Server Virtualization Business Unit
Cisco Systems