Re: caching on MPI handles
Rajeev Thakur (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Fri, 18 Oct 1996 16:55:42 -0500
> From: "Eric Salo" <email@example.com>
> I didn't think this would work, but now I can't remember why...
> Are there any cases for which a non-null copy_fn would even be useful? If I
> understand you correctly, all you really care about is the delete_fn, right?
Yes, I mainly care about the delete function. I don't intend to use
the copy function. So, if we say "when a new datatype is created
from an old one, the attribute does not get propagated to the new
one", that would be fine with me.