Re: generalized requests

Koichi Konishi (konishi@research.nj.nec.com)
Thu, 27 Jun 1996 14:57:48 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Raja Daoud: "Re: generalized requests"
Previous message: (no name): "Hanlders"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Huss-Lederman: "generalized requests"
Next in thread: Raja Daoud: "Re: generalized requests"

I agree to Raja and Marc.
Bringing back the handlers with a different semantics in
no-thread environments is the way to go.
With that, the second GR proposal can be dismissed.
(I still think "complete_fn" in the first GR proposal can be dropped).

I failed to see, however, why "no limitations on functions" is
possible in no-thread environments. Is a handler allowed to block by
calling, say, UNIX select() syscall?

Koichi Konishi konishi@research.nj.nec.com
NEC Research Institute Office: 609-951-2628
FAX: 609-951-2488

Next message: Raja Daoud: "Re: generalized requests"
Previous message: (no name): "Hanlders"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Huss-Lederman: "generalized requests"
Next in thread: Raja Daoud: "Re: generalized requests"