Received: from mail.think.com (Mail.Think.COM [131.239.33.16]) by antares.mcs.anl.gov (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP
id MAA04126 for <mpi-external@mcs.anl.gov>; Wed, 2 Aug 1995 12:59:56 -0500
Received: from Thokk.Think.COM by mail.think.com; Wed, 2 Aug 95 13:59:53 -0400
Received: by thokk.think.com (4.1/Think-1.2)
id AA19717; Wed, 2 Aug 95 13:59:52 EDT
Message-Id: <9508021759.AA19717@thokk.think.com>
To: "Nathan E. Doss" <doss@erc.msstate.edu>
Cc: mpi-external@mcs.anl.gov
Subject: Re: Revised generalized cacheing proposal
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 95 13:59:52 EDT
From: David Taylor <taylor@Think.COM>
Don't the generalized attr_get, attr_put, and attr_delete functions need
an argument to tell what type of MPI handle is being handed to the
function?
Also, I thought that MPI_STATUS wasn't going to be one of the handle
types since it isn't opaque.
David
-- David Taylor taylor@think.comPGP key available upon request. PGP key fingerprint = 99 6D F6 2C 1E 00 FD 3D A7 55 1B 2E 03 25 7E 6C