I want to modify my own proposal, that was:
>1-SIDED 65:37-45, 66:4,11 the name 'base' should be modified to
> 94:10 reflect the 'one less dereference'
> comparing 'base' of MPI_ALLOC_MEM
Lyndon showed me that "base" is used in the same way in MPI_MEM_FREE
and MPI_WIN_CREATE.
Therefore I think it is better to change the name in MPI_ALLOC_MEM
e.g. into "baseptr", affected lines:
65:19,23,25,27,29
66:7
And the explanation 65:23 into "pointer to the initial ..."
And 94:10 invalid base or baseptr argument
Rolf
PS: I'm not sure that the name MPI_COMM_CREATE_WIN was wanted.
I thought MPI_WIN_CREATE is the correct one.
Rolf Rabenseifner (Computer Center )
Rechenzentrum Universitaet Stuttgart (University of Stuttgart)
Allmandring 30 Phone: ++49 711 6855530
D-70550 Stuttgart 80 FAX: ++49 711 6787626
Germany rabenseifner@rus.uni-stuttgart.de