> I would argue that the implementation issues are quite similar to the extent
> that once we have even a single one of these critters, it opens up a whole
> Pandora's Box of pain. For example, someone (Greg, maybe?) has already pointed
> out that mandating ispawn is equivalent to mandating iallreduce. So it seems
> reasonable to address this in the full group, if for no other reason than to
> prevent it from coming up separately in each chapter.
>
>
I agree. In fact, in September I thought we agreed that "cross
referenced" issues would be addressed by the larger group as required.
I brought up the suggestion, as a result of concern fo inconsistencies
and/or design conflicts across chapters.
This will help us to address possible overlapping logic and
either agree to accept it or reject it.
------------
Anna Rounbehler
anna@sky.com