> Therefore I strongly recommend that we come up with new names for the
> C++ objects.
> I have no suggestion that I really like yet as to what names to give
> these, something like MPIX_... might be OK ?
Having different names for the C++ objects does seem to provide some
important advantages. Are there any substantive disadvantages?
What should the prefix for the C++ objects be? I have seen MPIX_ used
elsewhere (with some unofficial extensions), but it seems as good as
any other, e.g. MPIPP_, MPJ_.
Sincerely,
Andrew Lumsdaine