Re: Persistent sendrecv operations vs. persistent channels

Bob Madahar (bob.madahar@gecm.com)
Mon, 22 Apr 1996 11:32:05 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: K Vince Fernando: "MPI for the uninitiated ?"
Previous message: William C. Saphir: "dynamic process chapter"
Maybe in reply to: Tony Skjellum: "Persistent sendrecv operations vs. persistent channels"

So far I have not had time to come on line and provide input to the various
discussions. However in view of the forthcoming meeting the following should
be included:
Channels for optimal perfromance
An entity called an EVENT channel that could be
time
trigger
count
OR SOME OTHER EVENT TO PROMPT PROCESS(ES) INTO ACTION/INACTION

Will add details, particularly for realtime a.s.a.p

--
	
	Regards
	Dr. B. K. Madahar		|  Tel: +44 1245 242262
	Chief Scientist			|  Fax: +44 1245 475244 or 478639
	High Performance Computing
	Communications and Computing Laboratory
	GEC-Marconi Research Centre   
	Great Baddow
     	Chelmsford, Essex UK CM2 8HN    |  Email: bob.madahar@gecm.com

Next message: K Vince Fernando: "MPI for the uninitiated ?"
Previous message: William C. Saphir: "dynamic process chapter"
Maybe in reply to: Tony Skjellum: "Persistent sendrecv operations vs. persistent channels"