Re: 2-phase collective

Rolf Rabenseifner (Rabenseifner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE)
Thu, 6 Feb 1997 16:22:46 +0100 (MEZ)

> Since at least one of the calls must be collective the options are
>
> Start End
>
> 1) collective local
> 2) local collective
> 3) collective collective
>
> Option 1 gives you nothing beyond what you already have, so can be
> ignored.
> Option 2 is what Lloyd appears to be proposing.
and what the 4th Feb draft says
> Option 3 is what the text currently (15th Jan. draft) says.

After the discussion for me it looks that the best solution is 3.
It simplifies implementation and does not complicates application
programming excessively.

I want to ask whether this is a consent?

(Then we could change the Feb. 4th draft to this option.)

Rolf


Rolf Rabenseifner (Computer Center )
Rechenzentrum Universitaet Stuttgart (University of Stuttgart)
Allmandring 30 Phone: ++49 711 6855530
D-70550 Stuttgart 80 FAX: ++49 711 6787626
Germany rabenseifner@rus.uni-stuttgart.de