Re: 1-sided proposals comparison

Rolf Rabenseifner (Rabenseifner@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE)
Thu, 22 Aug 1996 10:30:54 +0200 (DST)

Sorry,

I had made a bad typo: (Thank you Dave for finding it)

Correct is:

The proposals are:
A) The main proposal voted in June.
B) Marc's post(any)/start(rank) & complete(rank)/wait(count)
from 16th Aug. with the additional mail from 17th Aug.
C) same as B), but post(any) /start(rank) is substituted by
^^^^-- (instead of A)
post(rank)/start(count)
D) same as C), but both pairs post(rank)/start(count) and
^^^^-- (instead of B)
complete(rank)/wait(count) are substituted by one pair
post(rank)/wait(count), that is used for both functionalities.
This is the proposal from Raja, but with Marc's progress rules.
E) Dave's put/get/offer proposal.


Rolf Rabenseifner (Computer Center )
Rechenzentrum Universitaet Stuttgart (University of Stuttgart)
Allmandring 30 Phone: ++49 711 6855530
D-70550 Stuttgart 80 FAX: ++49 711 6787626
Germany rabenseifner@rus.uni-stuttgart.de